AI Misalignment Watch Dashboard

  • 160Total incidents
  • 43Public incidents
  • 117Testing incidents
  • 107Median days to first report
  • 42%First reported by developer
  • 383Total reports
  • 210Incident reports
  • 173Research reports

We track AI misalignment incidents and gather every report about each one, starting with the company that built the model. Every incident gets a severity score from 0 to 10, built from how far it reached and how deliberate it was. Every incident and report is approved by a person before it goes live.

Up to date as of Nov 3, 2026

Consequence against misbehavior, AI Misalignment WatchConsequence against misbehavior. Color: quadrant. Size: severity score.Consequence against misbehaviorColor: quadrant. Size: severity score.02468100246810Contained, deliberateReached the real world, deliberateContained, overtReached the real world, overtConsequence score (0–10)Misbehavior score (0–10)Reached the real world, deliberate (14)Reached the real world, overt (32)Contained, deliberate (37)Contained, overt (77)Size: severity score (1, 5, 10)Quadrant boundary (5)Points are moved by at most 0.15 so overlaps show.n = 160 incidents
AI model family by kind of behavior, AI Misalignment WatchAI model family by kind of behavior. Incidents in each cell, adjusted for reporting volume.AI model family by kind of behaviorIncidents in each cell, adjusted for reporting volume.Went past a limitGamed a testHid somethingDeceived someoneUsed access it shouldn't haveNone recordedProtected itselfSabotaged workClaude (Anthropic)23.012.019.016.07.02.01.01.0n=81Not stated20.022.07.06.09.02.02.02.0n=70GPT (OpenAI)23.013.011.09.09.02.0n=67Several model families11.012.08.07.03.06.04.03.0n=54Other model family3.010.01.01.0n=15Gemini (Google)1.01.0n=2Llama or Muse (Meta)1.01.0n=2n=80n=71n=46n=39n=28n=14n=7n=6Kind of behaviorAI model family023.0Incidents, adjusted for reporting volumeAdjusted for reporting volume: each incident counts as 1 divided by the number of reportsits first-reporting organization has published, so heavy reporters do not dominate.An incident with several kinds of behavior is counted in each, so the cells add up to more than the incident total.n = 160 incidents, adjusted for reporting volume
AI model family by time to first report, AI Misalignment WatchAI model family by time to first report. Incidents in each cell, adjusted for reporting volume.AI model family by time to first reportIncidents in each cell, adjusted for reporting volume.under 1 week1–4 weeks1–3 months3–12 monthsClaude (Anthropic)31.05.05.0n=41Not stated19.03.015.0n=37GPT (OpenAI)12.04.03.016.0n=35Several model families19.010.02.0n=31Other model family7.06.0n=13Llama or Muse (Meta)2.0n=2Gemini (Google)1.0n=1n=91n=28n=5n=36Time to first reportAI model family031.0Incidents, adjusted for reporting volumeAdjusted for reporting volume: each incident counts as 1 divided by the number of reportsits first-reporting organization has published, so heavy reporters do not dominate.n = 160 incidents, adjusted for reporting volume
Severity against time to first report, AI Misalignment WatchSeverity against time to first report. Color: AI model family. Size: reports about the incident.Severity against time to first reportColor: AI model family. Size: reports about the incident.01002003000246810Days from event to first reportSeverity score (0–10)Claude (Anthropic) (41)Not stated (37)GPT (OpenAI) (35)Several model families (31)Other model family (13)Llama or Muse (Meta) (2)Gemini (Google) (1)Size: reports about the incident (1, 2, 5)Linear fitLinear fit: slope 0.00844 per day, r = 0.22, p = 0.005, n = 160Severity points are moved by at most 0.15 so overlaps show; the fit uses the true values.n = 160 incidents

Every score, every incident and the full data, with charts you can zoom, re-plot and download: Open The Data