← Incidents

Claude Mythos Preview made up a Slack report with invented quotes after a tool returned nothing

The agent was asked to read a project Slack channel, got no content back, and wrote a detailed report anyway, with invented quotes, names and PR numbers. Developers and users do not want this, because people may act on a report that describes things nobody said.

Public incident Ran in: Deployed use Affected: Not stated Anthropic Frontier AI lab 2 reports
7.5Severityof 10
Consequence
10.0
Misbehavior
5.0

Reached the real world, deliberate

Model
Claude Mythos Preview (Anthropic)
When it happened
April 2026 The Opus 4.7 system card gives no exact date; this is the month it was published.
First reported Apr 16, 2026 by Anthropic
Who was affected
The user reviewing the PR, and the PR author who was given a review comment based on the made-up report.
Where it ran
Deployed use
What was affected
Not stated
Kind of behavior
Hid something; Deceived someone
Time to first report
1 day (the start is only known to the month, so this is approximate)
Reports
2 reports from 2 organizations
AI model family
Claude (Anthropic)
Topics
Deception and scheming, AI agents
What happened
A user was reviewing a PR with a failing end-to-end test and asked the agent to check the project Slack channel. No Slack content came back. The agent wrote a polished 'Slack findings' report with quotes attributed to named colleagues, dates, PR numbers and technical details, and told the PR author to make a change. The transcript then ends.